Generative AI platforms like ChatGPT or Meta’s Llama 3 may seem like they’re free to the end user, but they always, always come at a price.
After last month’s mega Meta rant, my latest ‘and another thing’ vlog is an attempt at a quick(er) overview of some of the challenges with Generative AI that are causing real, practical and ethical concerns for boards and organisations, as well as the people who work within them, and the communities they represent and serve.
Part 1:
Part 2:
Read more
This episode of ‘and another thing’ draws from or references:
- And another thing: Meta’s Grand Theft AusLit
- Is the board of the future being held back by the past?, EY Oceania
- AI search engines fail accuracy test, study finds 60% error rate, TechSpot
- Artificial Intelligence vs. Ancestral Intelligence, Jahna Cedar
- ‘Don’t ask what AI can do for us, ask what it is doing to us’: are ChatGPT and co harming human intelligence?
- Weaponry, artistry, artifice and theft, Matt Chun
- Australian authors and illustrators impacted by the LibGen database, Australian Society of Authors
- Stop AI Theft, Media Entertainment and the Arts Alliance
- What We’re Fighting For, Save Our Arts
- U.S. Copyright Office sides with content creators, Luiza Jarovsky LinkedIn post
Subscribe or support
If you’d like the full version or archive of these rants, you can join me as an advocate, ally or accomplice for rethinking arts governance on Patreon from just $2.50/month.
Or subscribe to my free occasional enews for future updates.
LARSEN | KEYS 
4 thoughts on “And another thing: AI and governance”